Michael Glenthorne Porter attended Scotch College, South Australia, was an undergraduate economics student and then tutor at Adelaide University, 1961-64 and a PhD student at Stanford University (USA) 1965-68 on full scholarship.
As an undergraduate, he was Treasurer of the Student's Representative Council 1962-63, founding Treasurer of the ALP Club 1963 which replaced the Labour Club. He was appointed to the three person economics Committee of national Young Labor during the reform-oriented Dunstan and Whitlam period. He was a founding organiser of what became the Adelaide branch of the Australian Overseas Student Travel Service, and its 60 selected students 3-month inaugural visit to India in 1962-63. The pioneer group travelled by 3rd class rail and hitching on trucks across village India. There were family homestays in major capitals. Michael was one of 10 students invited to meet with Prime Minister Nehru in the Lok Sabha of the Indian Parliament. He was an Adelaide delegate to the annual National Union Australian University Students meetings.
After finishing his PhD course work at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California in 1968, he was an assistant professor at Simon Fraser Universities (Canada) 1968-70 and visiting research scholar at the University of Essex, UK on a Canada Council Fellowship in 1969-70, while finishing the thesis component of the Stanford PhD. His PhD research thesis was on exchange rate dynamics, both short and long run, as reflected in the relative intertemporal term structure of national government bond interest rates. In the spirit of Irving Fisher It was a new way of addressing the implications of high capital mobility on monetary autonomy and inflation and economic management at the national level. The Canadian currency float in the 1950s was a useful case study; but the subsequent float of the German Deutsche Mark (DM) in 1971 became his policy focus when he later moved to the Research and policy Department of the International Monetary Fund in Washington DC 1970-72. He would later take similar jobs on leave from the IMF, with The Reserve Bank of Australia in 1972-3 and the department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (Priorities Review Staff) 1973-75.
His first post-academic job after completing PhD course work at Stanford University and two years in universities in Canada and the UK, was with the International Monetary Fund (Research Department, Wash. DC, 1970). In the IMF Research Department, he played a lead role in modelling the factors and reasons why Germany, for example, needed to and eventually did float the DM currency in March 1973. This was a pioneering move in the IMF "Bretton Woods" context, given the international inflation emerging from the US with its "unfinanced" Vietnam war. The shackles of politically fixed exchange rates and direct trade and capital controls post the Bretton Woods agreements underpinning the IMF were being challenged, now including within the IMF.
Michael's main work within the IMF and some central banks, was much inspired by Stanford's Ronald McKinnon's and Nobel Laureate Robert Mundell for theories of internal and external balance under fixed versus floating exchange rate. Given high international capital mobility between the German Deutsche Mark (DM) and other foreign currencies, floating with consistent fiscal policies, became understood as a probable but not yet quantified key means to restore control of the money supply and resist importing inflation. This monetary pressure came from US and global capital markets in the context of the LBJ deficit-funded Vietnam War.
The contribution of Michael's internal arguments and then documents and published IMF Staff Paper's model, was to successfully quantify behavioural links to IMF satisfaction, à la McKinnon and Mundell, between attempts at independent monetary policy and induced offsetting capital movements. These models and their econometric estimation accurately predict and predicted net international capital movements in relation to Germany and showed that with fixed exchange rates independent anti-inflationary policy would not work at all. There would be 100% offset to monetary restriction through induced net international capital inflows.
Post the consequences of early 1920s hyperinflation, Germany was not in 1970 a country to tolerate domestic or imported inflation and so had to float, Porter argued within the IMF and at conferences, against powerful official and academic opposition . The Deutsche Bundesbank eventually agreed in public, not least at a 1972 international monetary conference in Konstanz at which Michael presented.
Following a challenge from a leading American monetary economist, Karl Brunner, the session featured a phone call from the Governor of the Fed to the President of the Deutsche Bundesbank on the point that Germany had to float the DM in order to retain independent control of the German base money supply , with both central bankers confirming their agreement with the Kouri-Porter paper.. And there were many countries in Germany's situation in the early 1970s - even Australia - and floating currencies followed over the next decade or so.
In 1972 Michael published at the IMF and later on 1974 with Pentti Kouri (also of the IMF and later MIT, Stanford, Yale and controversially, Finland) the first successful predictive general equilibrium portfolio econometric model of how international capital movements offset the workings of attempts at independent monetary policy applied to four differing economies - Germany, Italy, Canada and Australia. The extent of offset was shown to vary significantly across these different currency areas, creating a reason to float within a market-based foreign exchange system. Versions of these papers were presented at many conferences in Europe, N America and Australia and published in IMF Staff Papers 1971 and The Journal of Political Economy, March 1972 and later applied in Australia and many other economies.
After implementation of the German financial reforms Michael was invited to be a Senior Adviser at The Reserve Bank of Australia, International Department, 1972-73, as Australia battled the same global imported inflation given official exchange rate rigidity that weakened independent monetary policy in open economies. He prepared RBA papers for the international Committee of 20 meetings on related monetary and capital market reform.
Extending leave from the IMF, post a pneumonectomy in Washington DC. and related health issues, and a period at the RBA, the election of the Whitlam Labor Government in Dec 1972, created a role for Michael as a founding senior economic adviser with The Priorities Review Staff (PRS) of the new Prime Minister of Australia. In 1973-5. Austin Holmes, former Chief Economist of the RBA was made founding Director of the PRS, and Michael became Senior Adviser from the start.
A key part of the PRS assignment, with a staff rising to 20, was development of economic and social reform policy options, commentary on most economically important Cabinet submissions by all Ministers and preparation of comment on the long term forward estimates of potential expenditure and revenue and associated policies. This involved advising Ministers via the PM as to consequences of alternative economic and financing strategies, in the context of the Labor Government having been out of office for 23 years.
Despite the Whitlam government's fiscal foibles and failures, due in part to an impatient parliamentary "back bench", the social reforms were substantial, e.g. in health, welfare and education, and beneficial economic trade and financial reform pressures set in. Australia rose to the top of league growth tables and international economic performance in the decades ahead. Whereas blue collar workers real incomes in the USA have been stagnant over three most recent decades their Australian counterparts have doubled their real incomes within the same three decades, and in a fairly equitable and sustainable society.
There was however resulting pressure after 23 years out, for what became an excessive and inflationary pace of new expenditures to meet pent up and reformist social and political demands in the elected base. Measures agreed by the reforming Whitlam government included dramatic tariff cuts and anti-protectionist regulatory changes, and what became new comprehensive universal Medicare and insurance reforms integrated with tax reforms. Some reforms were frequently contested with Treasury including financial liberalisation supported by the Reserve Bank (eg floating), but which was eventually implemented by the Hawke-Keating government 1983.
In 1975, as the Whitlam Government battled the consequences of failure to implement fiscal rectitude, Michael accepted a part time senior lectureship at the ANU, which briefly became full time in 1976. However, Monash University concurrently offered Michael a tenured chair which he accepted later in 1975 and moved to Monash in mid 1976.
His Monash days as a teaching professor were cut short with acceptance of the Irving Fisher Chair, Yale University in 1978-79 followed by a brief Visiting Professorship at "The Fed", in the International Department of the Federal Reserve System in Washington DC. The Fed is the USA Central Bank, and the banker to most of the world's central banks' foreign currency reserves.
As a lead-in to what became the 1983 "Hawke-Keating" financial reforms, in 1976 Michael within Monash University had organised a three-day invited conference at a State Bank of Victoria retreat, on the need for reform of the Australian Financial System. Participants included the leading figures in Treasury, the Reserve Bank, academia, business and the international finance and banking sector. The conference and proceedings were presented in M. G. Porter, Editor, The Australian Monetary System in the 1970's, Monash University, 1978, published by the Economic Society of Australia and NZ as a supplementary issue of the Economic Record, 1978.
What followed was a 1979 Howard government Commonwealth Committee of Inquiry into the Australian Financial System, chaired by Keith Campbell, and Michael Porter was appointed consultant No 1. The "Campbell Report" in September 1981, addressed the issues covered and recommended at his earlier Monash Conference and in the consultant reports, advocating a clean German style float with associated base monetary targeting and general financial market liberalisation. (i.e. not the then current trade-weighted midnight daily pegging of the $A by the RBA, nicknamed the "Floating Pig")
The goal was disciplined control of the monetary base and its fiscal and external dimensions with a clean float of the $A. (Whitlam in government in 1974 agreed to a PRS paper at a secret Sunday single purpose meeting at The Lodge with a paper prepared by Michael Porter and Trade advisor Brian Brogan. But Treasury blocked the move in 1974 but approved the Floating Pig that year. The clean float and "full Campbell" would eventually be achieved by a Labor Government in 1983 under Treasurer Keating and PM Bob Hawke, who was coached when trade union ACTU Advocate by Michael Porter's honours thesis supervisor at the University of Adelaide.
In 1978-79 Michael took leave of previous appointments to accept a offer from Nobel Laureate Professor James Tobin of the Irving Fisher Professorship at Yale University.
The Fed's International Department is charged with advising the US government and the Federal Reserve Board on all international economic issues including monetary and external financial flows and adjustments. It is the USA's central bank, but also in effect the central bank to the world's multiple central banks, holding their US $ deposits, and often their gold at Fort Knox.
In mid-1979 Michael was a Visiting Professor at the US "Fed" (Federal Board of Governors), International Department, Washington D.C. While at the Fed he also presented at a Treasury seminar the Kouri-Porter capital movements model blended with an exchange rate paper from his Stanford PhD thesis. As an application, the thesis model was used to predict on current policies in both countries the UK pound-US$ exchange rate for the Orwellian year 1984 - Parity! The higher term structure of UK c.f. US interest rates from 1979 in both countries suggested this pre-Thatcher Britain currency would depreciate to 1 US$. The following unpopular dramatic fiscal and monetary restraint in the UK would invalidate the prediction - since a major Thatcher reversal of policy in the UK had the desired effects.
Michael also presented at a range of conferences at this time in Europe, the US and Australia, all addressing the issue of monetary, capital market and exchange rate policy reform, where the Kouri-Porter papers and JPE model of capital movements were actively debated in the context of the emerging but uneven acceptability of floating exchange rates (see below).
In late 1979, when back from Washington, Yale and earlier Stanford to Melbourne, Michael dejected by the Australian university policy and management scene, was influenced by the potential of US and UK think tanks and IT teams he had witnessed changing the quality of governance and technology, often for the better. What was clear was that unlike political parties they could recruit quality people from all universities, businesses and governments, focused on issues of the day.
Finance for think tanks was difficult up front - but in the Australian case more feasible on a project-based from private and public sources and hopefully with independence contingent on the integrity of the individuals - ideally top academics and experienced players. They were usually goal driven and placed a premium of efficiency and effectiveness in areas of major concern. They also needed in most cases to be self-financing based on performance, which meant very different additional skills were needed.
As discussed below, while at Yale he agreed to return to Monash but with a new role; avoiding Chairmanship and regular professor duties; and a Dean supported mandate to found a new and hopefully self-funding Centre of Policy Studies within the Faculty of Economics and Politics. with a short-period underwriting of his tenured salary and a secretary.
On return from Yale in 1979, Michael was then appointed Founding Director, of an independent Centre of Policy Studies (CoPS) within Monash University, Faculty of Economics and Politics. CoPS quickly became successfully and independently funded through substantial research grants from the public and private sectors, roughly 50:50.
At CoPS in the 1980s Michael recruited outstanding young and experienced persons, mainly reform-minded economists from the top US universities, the UK, New Zealand Treasury, the financial press and worldwide. As examples, initial employment of non-academics included a former Chief Economist from Shell, Doug Hocking, SA Minister of Energy and also an ex Minister of Education from South Australia, ex Cambridge economics, Hugh Hudson plus the retiring controversial Secretary of the Treasury, who was also an ex-IMF Executive Director who had been on the side against floating currencies at the IMF and in Australian Treasury.
Following these appointments CoPS advanced pioneering work on financial reforms, energy reform including electricity and water trading, tax reform, unbundling and privatization. Michael was able to greatly expand activity after he was awarded a Commonwealth Government Research Centre of Excellence Award - $2.6 mill over 6 years from 1982 ($20-$30 million today), the only such award in economics after 364 proposals from all universities in Australia for all manner of proposed centres, was reduced to 10 winners. This led to many outstanding CoPS visitors including four Nobel Laureates and the current Google chief economist.
The main activities of the expanding CoPS team were developing detailed economic policy research documents and associated reform implementation agendas. This involved publishing over 100 working papers, books and reprints, and running public seminars often in leading city hotels to attract Ministers, the external private and public sector thought leaders and community groups, always on key policy issues in the public and private sectors. The work had in fact begun with the energy sector, given the oil crises, but extended again into financial liberalisation, economic reform, state enterprise and regulatory reform, and the conditions for beneficial and competitive private sector participation in infrastructure in Australia and then Asia.
Back in 1989 Michael Porter and the Tasman team plus others, proposed forming a Tasman University, an exploration in a joint venture set in Melbourne and Auckland, in the fast growing Asian market, with strong US academic linkages and financial support in Australia New Zealand and the US.
The concept arose out of frustration with the then and current university system in both countries, and at Prime Minister level. There was a series of meetings with academics and potential partners/potential sponsors and joint venturers, globally and locally. The resulting structure was legally registered in Auckland, NZ, but not in Victoria owing to the word "university" being privileged at State level in Australia. Despite the quality of universities being dreadfully downgraded seemingly by mergers of anything with classrooms
Any hope of gaining legislative support was quickly blocked from Victorian and Australian registration by the Commonwealth Minister of Education John Dawkins, and indirectly by the Victorian Labor Government. The proposal was enthusiastically supported by top universities and students alike - globally. All were aware of the decline and pending or actual forced mergers of all sorts of institutions badged universities in Australia led by John Dawkins, the Minister. Financed by discriminating fees against foreign students and with problems hidden or delayed by a loan scheme for local students.
Following Michael Porter's visits to 20 international scholars in US and UK, some with Nobel Prizes in economics, who were keen for joint appointments on a start-up university JV model in the highest ranked pair of liveable cities in the world. Southern hemisphere climate and the high growth potential Asian market made it very clear demand and quality would be there. Only one outstanding scholar in 20 Michael approached in the US was not keen - he was about to head a top Ivy league university! Asian countries and notably top students from China and India were in abundance and complaining about quality - but wanted visas as much as an education.
The Porter mission attracted significant international and domestic business interest. Broadly based community leaders and financiers also indicated enthusiastic support and resources in many dimensions, awaiting that all-important Victorian registration authority. That Tasman "testing of the waters" revealed the current state dominated "vanilla" university structure was mis-financed in part by government run and foreign student-taxed finance plus politically set fees and loan arrangements was a real attractor to an alternative model. Australia's globally ranked successful economic reforms in the 1980s were also a source of interest and thus an attraction to foreign scholars and educational investors
In Tasman Melbourne initial and committed financial and personal support was from Baillieu Myer AC, Richard Pratt, Rupert Murdoch AC and Hugh Morgan AC, to name a few. In New Zealand the Business Roundtable was 100% in support from the Chairman Sir Ronald Trotter to business and community leader Alan Gibbs, Finance Minister Sir Roger Douglas and PM David Lange - who said to Michael that New Zealand "needed the new model more than even Australia". There was clearly head of steam for an Australian start-up university, most likely for a joint venture university with outstanding US universities that were interested on a sister relationship. Silicon Valley billionaires were looming in the direction of supporting Australia and private independent universities.
After CoPS publishing in academic journals, conferences and forming academic think tanks in the 1970-80s, typically on international economic integration, social reform and financial risks, Michael left the public sector and Monash University and focused from the early 1990s on implementation and support for economic reform, investment banking, advisory work, significantly with seven international governments. Michael's base was now the privately private sector financed Tasman Institute and Tasman Asia Pacific.
However there continued to be significant public sector project support in areas like energy, tax, environment, health and general policy. Tasman Asia Pacific would continue until 2010. In 1998-2002 Michael also joined Macquarie Bank (now the world's leading infrastructure bank) ibn Sydney as a full time Division Director in the infrastructure and the Asia-Pacific connected divisions while retaining control and visiting Tasman a day a week. Tasman had outside directors for varying periods. Macquarie Bank by 1998 was a 25% shareholder in Tasman Asia Pacific PL with two Macquarie Bank leaders, Nicholas Moore and Michael Carapiet as Directors. The other Tasman directors included Baillieu Myer, AC, (Chair), Sir Roger Douglas (Deputy Chair), Lachlan Murdoch and, once the Tasman University proposal was active, New Zealanders Sir Ronald Trotter, Alan Gibbs, Roger Kerr and John Fernyhough were key contributors.
The various Tasman developments in the 1989 had followed an end to six years of competitively earned Commonwealth Government research Centre funding for CoPS. At Baillieu Myers and Sir Roger Douglas suggestion, there was a resulting attempt in 1989-90 for Michael to form and fund a not-for-profit Tasman University (see below), subsequently politically blocked. After that political frustration, Michael and some former CoPS colleagues left Monash University and raised funds from the private sector to form The Tasman Institute in early 1990 and an associated economic consultancy which became Tasman Asia Pacific (later Tasman Economics and ACIL Tasman under separate but jount direction from Michael).
The published Australian independent reform agendas that emerged in 1990-98 from the new Tasman Institute and the consultancies embraced earlier CoPS work included Reform of State-Owned Enterprises in Victoria, Energy Pricing Issues in Victoria, National Priorities Project, (two volumes, Spending and Taxing I, Spending and Taxing II), Markets and Environment, New Strategies for Transport in Victoria. These were some of the key documents assembled for Project Victoria, preceding the 1992 Victorian election. This Project was jointly organised from 1990 with the Institute of Public Affairs. These documents and associated public conferences and meetings were widely publicised in the media (ABC, The Australian and the Australian Financial Review) and were influential in many policy forums in Australia and overseas in the 1980s.
The state enterprise reform work, financial reform advice and other proposed infrastructure innovation while originally focused on Victoria, NZ and Australia, became a focus much in demand later in the 1990s in many parts of Asia, with funded projects won from the World Bank, The Asian Development Bank, ASEAN and AusAID. Michael had become a frequent adviser to NZ Reserve Bank and New Zealand Treasury and particularly Finance Minister Sir Roger Douglas, who on retirement from the New Zealand Cabinet became Deputy Chairman of Tasman Institute and Tasman Asia Pacific under Michael as Executive Director.
Building on the new 1990s pro-reform climate regarding infrastructure investment, and well-structured regulatory reforms and public-private partnerships, there was a climate for similar reforms overseas, and Tasman Asia Pacific won work often in partnerships as in Vietnam (below). Competitive funding received became substantial relative to university funding.
In 1995 Tasman Asia Pacific with Kinhill International were commissioned by AusAID and the Vietnam Ministry of Planning and Investment to prepare a Master Plan for the Southern Focal Zone of Vietnam. The engineering by project consultants Kinhill International managed the AusAID contract. The combined masterplan report was a joint effort led by Greg Kemp, Kinhill International, engineering, and the economics by Michael Porter with Tasman Asia Pacific.and (see cover of the Final 250 page Sept. 1996 report attached).
Over the recent years since Doi Moi and Equiitization , the SEFZ had been the fastest growing region Vietnam, and its infrastructure leaders and Peoples' Committees in the provinces were deeply interested in the infrastructure reforms in countries as diverse as Australia (they visited Victoria infrastructure projects during the project), Singapore and China. The study was to develop infrastructure plans jointly with the Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI), led by economist Prof Tran Van Gia, based in Hanoi, but with an MPI and Kinhill-Tasman office and residence in Ho Chi Mon City. The data base and reference points were built from 45 existing MPI and regional planning documents, in particular from Hoc Chi Minh City, Ba Ria, Vung Tao, Dong Nai and Song Be. The focus was on the strengths and weaknesses of past policies and plans prepared in Vietnam and reviews about the obstacles and opportunities for Development, over 1995-6 and the 250-page report was presented in 1996 to the Government of Vietnam via Ministry of Planning an investment in Hanoi.. Michael Porter presented the Report as economic director of the project, but his counterpart was now the Minister of Planning and Investment Prof Tran Van Gia. and his counterpart from the Ministry of planning an investment in Vietnam was Prof Tran Van Gia. Over the decades since the report was completed Vietnamese government has indeed implemented much of the plan and is it has facilitated TG investment in most areas of infrastructure including telecommunications, electricity and gas, transport, aviation and shipping and the development of the ports of southern Vietnam.
Michael became was appointed Division Director of Macquarie Bank, Infrastructure Division, from 1998-2002 at the head office in Sydney. Macquarie Bank became a 25% shareholder in Tasman Asia Pacific. And Michael worked on a range of infrastructure related projects - power, water, transport and general infrastructure in Australia, South Korea, India, Singapore, UK and Canada and across a range of ASEAN countries. He continued to be Executive Director of Tasman Asia Pacific and others took major executive authority and joint ventures were formed with other consultancies.
From 2002 Michael for Tasman Asia Pacific led a range of Asian Development Bank, World Bank and ASEAN infrastructure projects based from World Bank and Tasman shared offices in Jakarta, but in sectors stretching from water, electricity to decentralisation strategies including West Timor, and on cross regional issues varying from Toll Roads with Jasa Maga, to Water with Pam Jaya, and Electricity with PLN, the central generating utility. Michael also met on numerous occasions in Bandung at the consulting firm and economic think tank (residence) of the His Excellency Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY), then senior Coordinating Minister, for Political and Security Affairs in the Government of Indonesia Minister for Aceh and Security. SBY, the future President of Indonesia, was completing a PhD in economics and wanted to launch a "second wave" in economic reform in Indonesia). Tasman and SBY's think tank had been exchanging infrastructure, trade policy and exchange rate issues.
In August 2003 Michael and Tasman Asia Pacific were invited by the office of SBY, then visiting Blair House and the White House in Washington DC, to host two meetings in Australia, one became an open meeting at The Sydney Myer Centre, Melbourne University, the other a private Asia Society discussion hosted by Tasman in a Melbourne law firm. This was the first international launch of SBY as a candidate for President, in what was the first open democratic Indonesian Presidential election. The title was "A Second Wave of Economic Reform for Indonesia". The private dinner presentation by SBY to the Asia Society was on Indonesian problematic governance and leadership in recent decades and current economic challenges.
After SBY was elected President, 2004 Michael was appointed Consultant Adviser to the Indonesia Government Cabinet Committee on Policy for the Acceleration of Infrastructure Investment (KKPPI). He also was invited to assist the Coordinating Ministry of Economic Affairs in Jakarta and key Ministers and staff of KKPPI in relation to the 2005 Indonesian Infrastructure Summit, assisting with consistency and content of key speeches and documents issued. He drafted speeches from the key Ministers at this Presidential Summit and was an active facilitator for the SBY government at the two-day event. This leadership role was funded by the TAMF project of AusAID.
A separate major project in 2008 was jointly with CRISIL Infrastructure Advisory Group (the Indian subsidiary of Standard and Poor's, USA) to form an Indonesian "Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility", as per Indonesian Presidential Regulation 66 and supported by the Ministry of Finance. This project was under the auspices of the International Finance Corporation, The World Bank, The Asian Development Bank and other public sector donors, and financed by AusAID.
Michael also had a lead role in a 3-year Asian Development Bank project in Indonesia "Infrastructure Reform Sector Development Program" (IRSDP) aimed at mobilizing private and public sector funding for infrastructure, financed under a project grant attached to Loan 2264-INO. His role was to form an Infrastructure Policy Think Tank as part of the team to focus on significant, headline policy issues and infrastructure development initiatives. Dr Porter also advised on coordinating investment in the main infrastructure sectors, linking the important financing and investment issues across toll road development, ports, airports, and regional development issues.
Michael was founder and Chairman of the Asia Pacific Infrastructure Forum (APIF) formed in 2004 starting with a high-level three-day forum on infrastructure issues in Melbourne, Dec 2004, with sponsorship from the Australian, Victorian governments and the World Bank (PPIAF). This forum held in the Great Hall of the National Gallery of Victoria brought together key private and public sector leaders in infrastructure reform, regulation and financing from Asia and the Pacific. Follow-up Infrastructure Forums in China were held in Beijing, Tianjin and Shanghai, 2005-6 jointly with the China Development Bank, and with support for the Australian and Victorian governments in June/July 2006.
In 2004-5 Michael worked with Dr Hardiv Situmeang, PLN, Indonesia, for ASEAN on Facilitating Increased Interconnection and Power Trading in Electricity in ASEAN. This involved working with electricity utilities in all ten countries of ASEAN, and has led to proposals currently in the form of a MOU being presented to HAPUA (Heads of Power Utilities of ASEAN).
In 2004-5 Michael worked with Dr Hardiv Situmeang, Director, PLN, Indonesia, for ASEAN on Facilitating Increased Interconnection and Power Trading in Electricity in ASEAN. This involved working with electricity utilities in all ten countries of ASEAN, and led to proposals in the form of a MOU being presented to HAPUA (Heads of Power Utilities of ASEAN). One bottleneck was the need for unanimity within ASEAN and obtaining the agreement of Myanmar.
This problem was seemingly overcome by Michael eventually meeting with the CEO of Myanmar electricity in Yangon, who had completed his PhD in electrical engineering at Monash University - and coincidentally was familiar with Monash CoPS work on electricity reform in Victoria. However, the hope of building and extending an electricity grid and developing feeder hydro power in Myanmar proved a step too far, and while financing issues were to be negotiating support from Brunei, diversifying from oil, the coordination functions, the complexities of requiring unanimous voting in ASEAN proved beyond practicality.
A substantial Tasman Asia Pacific project of Dr Porter's, was leading an advisory exercise on public-private partnerships and financing infrastructure, "Technical Assistance for Improving Delivery of Infrastructure Services in the Pacific", 2006-7. This TA was part of a joint Asian Development Bank (ADB), World Bank (WB) and Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) initiative to systematically address infrastructure issues in the infrastructure-poor Pacific region. The project identified the requisites for building effective partnerships with the private and public sectors in meeting the regions infrastructure needs, including financing, institutional development and managing required structural changes.
In Indonesia over last decade Michael has led infrastructure projects under the auspices of the Government of Indonesia including Toll Roads Reform (World Bank and Jasa Marga), Fiscal Decentralization (with ADB), under the Director General for Central and Regional Finance, Ministry of Finance, Water Sector Reform and privatization (World Bank and Pam Jaya), Restructure of Power Purchasing Agreements of PLN, with ADB, and a range of other related reform exercises.
The toll roads TA, within PU, helped prepared the way for regulatory reform and a restructure of Jasa Marga, and was a pre-cursor to the resulting formation of BPJT and the IPO of Jasa Marga. The team also developed proposals for packaging and financing toll-roads (old with new) in a competitively tendered manner capable of being financed by resulting development of adjacent infrastructure (ports, airports, real estate on docks) etc. While actions in these areas have lagged and differ in many ways from recommended strategies, they formed instructive experience on which to build.
In earlier years 1992-5 Michael had worked with Transurban on tolling strategies for the CityLink electronic toll project in Melbourne, which packaged old with new roads, and interlinked with the airport, seaport, rail and other roads systems. The most recent networking event being the Asia Pacific Infrastructure Forum held in Melbourne in Dec 2004 and follow up meetings in Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin in June 2005.
In Indonesia over the 1990s Michael led infrastructure projects under the auspices of the Government of Indonesia including Toll Roads Reform (World Bank and Jasa Marga), Fiscal Decentralization (with ADB), under the Director General for Central and Regional Finance, Ministry of Finance, Water Sector Reform and privatization (World Bank and Pam Jaya), Restructure of Power Purchasing Agreements of PLN, with ADB, and a range of other related reform exercises.
The toll roads project helped prepared the way for regulatory reform and a restructure of the toll road utility Jasa Marga, and was a pre-cursor to the resulting formation of BPJT and the IPO of Jasa Marga. The team also developed proposals for packaging and financing toll-roads (old with new as in Victoria) in a competitively tendered manner capable of being financed by resulting development of adjacent infrastructure (ports, airports, real estate on docks, etc). While actions in these areas have lagged and differ in many ways from recommended strategies, they formed instructive experience on which to build.
In earlier years 1992-5 Michael had worked with Transurban PL on tolling strategies for the CityLink electronic toll project in Melbourne, which packaged old with new roads, and interlinked with the airport, seaport, rail, bus and other roads systems. A networking event was organised under the Tasman created the Asia Pacific Infrastructure Forum held in Melbourne in Dec 2004 with discussions and comparative follow up meetings in Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin in June 2005
Post Tasman and Macquarie Bank, Michael was National Research and Policy Director with the Committee for Economic Development of Australia, with a focus including telecommunications and broadband, NBN, utilities reform, general economic management and taxation
Areas of publication included:
Michael was appointed by Vice Chancellor Jane den Hollander as a full Research Professor initially at the Alfred Deakin Research Institute (ADRI) on the Geelong waterfront.
Michael Porter won a major four-year Desalination research project for ADRI in September 2012 with funding of $1.1m, relating to coastal cities, 50% cash and the balance in in-kind technical assistance (AECOM Australia) , through a competitive grant from the Commonwealth Centre of Excellence in Desalination at Murdoch University in Western Australia. The project and its many publications in the next few years addressed the scope, costs and options for water desalination in Australia, leading to a dozen publications jointly with Prof Rodney Stewart and Dr Oz Sahin, of Griffiths University and the University of Queensland.
The project was funded from the Australian Government's "Water for the Future" initiative through the National Centre of Excellence in Desalination Australia. The in-kind support from AECOM brought global technology expertise and in kind support to the $1.1m project.
Within Deakin University Michael held the following professorial positions:
June 2011-13, Research Professor of Public Policy, Alfred Deakin Research Institute; 2013, Centre for Regional and Rural Futures, 2013-14, Centre for Economics and Financial Econometrics, Faculty of Business and Law, Deakin University, 2014; 2015-17, Research Professor and Honorary Research Professor, Centre for Regional and Rural Futures.
Consultant, NSW Treasury, Corporatisation Hunter Water Board, 1990-92 Victorian Treasury, 1992-93.
Advisory and consultancy on water institutions and water policy, World Bank, Asian Development Bank and AusAID projects on water governance, restructure, privatisation and investment, Philippines, Andhra Pradesh, India, Jakarta and Indonesia, Bangkok and Thailand, Fiji, Samoa.
As Founding Director Tasman Institute, 1990-98, and co- founder of Project Victoria, 1991-3, founded, was Co-Director and advised government and Opposition on restructure, vertical separation and privatisation of Victorian energy utilities, water utilities, Melbourne Water, transport. Founding Executive Director, Tasman Asia Pacific, 1991-2008
Tasman Asia Pacific and Tasman Institute were formed after Michael left the Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University in1989. This was also after an attempt to form and independent private university was blocked by the Minister for Education in Australia (see below).
Email : [email protected]